After rejecting the final Cenzi motion, the Parliament finally passes the 2023 Social Security budget.

On the benches of the National Assembly, after the adoption of the Social Security Financing Bill, on December 2, 2022.

The examination of the Social Security Funding Bill of 2023 (PLFSS) will remain a special occasion in the parliamentary history of V.e Republic. After five 49.3 and the failure to establish a sixth knowledge on this text, this time defended by the New People’s Ecological and Social Union (Nupes), on Friday, December 2, the “Secu” budget is now considered finally adopted by Parliament.

“This is a text for the most fragile, a text to protect those who suffer” Prime Minister Elizabeth Bourne announced after the challenge “Massive resources for our hospital, measures for cancer patients, single mothers, disabled people, dependent elderly”Under the challenges of Nupe MPs.

in the name of wanting to overthrow the government “Tramling the Parliament” and “The Urgency of Public Hospital Restoration”The four left-wing groups collected just 87 votes – including 60 for La France insoumise (LFI) – far short of the 289-vote absolute majority needed to censure the government. Rejecting in principle the votes of 89 deputies of the National Rally (RN) in his text, Nupes failed to mobilize the 148 signatories of this ninth proposal of censorship discussed since the beginning of the legislature.

At the end of a new confrontation between the opposition and the government, which has become almost a ritual in the National Assembly this autumn budget, Elizabeth Bourne ended the session by emphasizing that“In three years, Michel Rocard [premier ministre socialiste entre 1988 et 1991]That’s twenty-eight 49.3 and only five censure motions.”In this comparison, finding ways to hold the opposition accountable for short or even non-existent debates. “We must put the chicken back on the egg: without 49.3, there is no censure motion.” supported the Polynesian Communist MP, Moetai Dzmorason. “Do we want the debate to continue in this direction? Do we want a regular spectacle of heartache and sterile debate in this assembly? », M. was annoyedI with a thick head.

Absence of important measures for the hospital

Before Matignon tenant spoke, various speakers from the opposition groups expressed their disappointment with the quality of the parliamentary discussions, but also deep disagreements on the content of the PLFSS and even on the pension reform. From 21:30 in the evening, the elected “rebel” official of Bouches-du-Rhône, Manuel Bompard, launched a diatribe against the government’s project, whose arrival in parliament is announced in the spring of 2023. “Contrary to your claim, you do not have public support or a public mandate to raise the retirement age,” he argued.

Source: Le Monde

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *